生活广角

私召车司机收入减少 Grab：随季节与活动而波动_我的网站

一 |     受访Grab和Gojek平台的私召车司机表示，在过去六个月，他们感觉到收入减少了。

二 |     "Remember what happened in 1983? Two days after 241 Marines were blown up in Lebanon, the USA invaded tiny Grenada. Overnight, the previous headlines disappeared. I think we are seeing the same today. NATO is losing badly in Ukraine and it’s going to be a long winter for the West. Pounding its imperial chest with Taiwan is now what the MSM is reporting, much less so Ukraine," suggests Jeff J. Brown, author of "The China Trilogy," editor at China Rising Radio Sinoland, and curator of the Bioweapon Truth Commission.,If Pelosi travels to Taiwan, this would be the first time a high-ranking US politician visits the place in 25 years. Last time it was Newt Gingrich, then-speaker of the US House of Representatives, who arrived on the island in 1997, ignoring the Chinese leadership's discontent.,"I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period,'" Gingrich told the press at the time, as quoted by The New York Times. However, Clinton administration officials made it clear that Gingrich "was speaking for himself.",Likewise, it appears that Pelosi's apparent visit to Taiwan is not in line with the Biden administration's China policy, argues Francesco Sisci, a Beijing-based China expert, author, and columnist.,"American politics is not set like an omniscient Leviathan," the China expert says. "The Congress, the Senate, the executive all move according to different agendas which do not often coincide and are in conflict with one another. The issue is that there is a growing anti-Beijing sentiment in America and this has sometimes bursts which aren’t fully sorted out. I believe the visit is an expression of a sentiment, rather than of a clear cut plan.",According to CNN, Pelosi's initiative has triggered concerns both in the Biden administration and the Pentagon, with US national security officials "quietly working to convince House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of the risks of her potential trip to Taiwan." While in 1997 Beijing and Washington managed to solve the dilemma, this time the PRC leadership might opt for a harsher response, CNN and The Guardian have warned.,US Military Expansion in Asia-Pacific is Part of Plan to Take on Russo-China Tandem, Scholar Says28 July, 16:15 GMT,Washington has been fanning US-Sino tensions for quite a while, starting with Donald Trump's tariff war against Beijing, which has yet to be halted by Joe Biden. In a candid phone conversation, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned his American counterpart against "playing with fire" over Taiwan and explained that any involvement would ultimately backfire on the US.,"A Chinese general has publicly declared that Pelosi’s visit could entail a military response from Beijing," Brown says. "China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeated this. Now, with Xi’s 'You get burned playing with fire' metaphor, I think there would be a military response.",Senior Colonel Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Defense, stated on July 26: "If the US insists on taking its own course, the Chinese military will never sit idly by, and it will definitely take strong actions to thwart any external force's interference.",Tan highlighted that Pelosi's visit to Taiwan would "seriously violate the one-China principle" and "seriously harm China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and seriously damage the political foundation of China-US relations.",Meanwhile, Brown surmises that China's hypothetical response "might include a declared no-fly zone." However, there is a "much more elegant option," according to the author:,"[China could] take over Taiwan’s Kinmen Island, which is only two kilometers from Xiamen, off China’s Fujian Province coast. It would take only a few hours. I do not think Beijing will strike any US targets, unless attacked first.",North Korea Ready to Mobilize Nuclear Deterrence Forces at Any Moment - Kim Jong Un28 July, 01:13 GMT,The scholar also does not rule out that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) remark, made earlier this week, that Pyongyang is “fully prepared” for any military conflict with the United States is no coincidence.,"Does Biden know that China and nuclear-armed North Korea have had a mutual defense treaty since 1961?" Brown asks rhetorically. "NATO is being bled dry in Ukraine and it is imperial folly, hubris or geopolitical brinkmanship to think it can fight East Asia’s biggest and most powerful military, which is only 200 km from Taiwan.",For his part, Sisci believes that the PRC could opt for an asymmetrical non-military response. Still, the unfolding crisis is complicated by the fact that Washington is already involved in a confrontation with Russia, raising questions as to whether the US is capable of taking on Moscow and Beijing at once.,"I don’t think that either China or the US wants an escalation," says Sisci. "The talk between Biden and Xi Jinping was to avoid an escalation.",Brown also believes that Beijing's warnings have been heard by Washington.,"Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has been bandied about by Washington for months now," he says. "A supposed Covid-19 infection scuttled the first trial balloon. After Biden’s phone call yesterday with Xi, I suspect another American 'postponement' is likely to occur. If not, then 'Katy, bar the door!'"。对此，Grab表示，这种情况是季节性的。新传媒英文新闻网站CNA 采访了八名私召车司机，根据报道，Grab或Gojek的私召车司机都认为车费下降，导致收入减少。另外有三名只使用TADA平台的私召车司机则表示，他们未见收入下降。TADA采用的营运模式是零佣金模式。56岁的Grab司机Lee Chin Chye说，他过去每天工作十小时能赚取300元至500元，但从六个月前开始，收入开始减少，即便工作时间不变，他的收入减少约10%。李先生将原因指向Grab，认为是因为平台的车费降低导致收入减少。他说：“平台与平台之间的竞争，以及乘客需求下降，对收入有很大的影响。”车费是否被降低？Grab和Gojek受询时未就此作出回应。根据数据平台Measurable AI的数据，在本地五个私召车平台中，Grab在2022年占据新加坡私召车平台市场的50.2%，居于主导地位。

三 | 其次是Gojek，占17.7%；ComfortDelGro占15.1%；TADA占11.1%；Ryde则占5.9%。收入减少 私召车司机感担忧 收入下降的问题令许多私召车司机，尤其是年轻或有财务负担的私召车司机们感到担忧。一名匿名的31岁Gojek私召车司机表示，他的收入减少了10%，但目前他没有打算放弃当私召车司机。

四 | 他因工伤失去了之前的工作，过去五年一直靠当私召车司机，养活五个孩子。另一名56岁Grab司机李先生则面临更大压力。过去六个月里，他的收入下降约20%。他表示，过去每天工作十小时可赚取约300新元，如今则仅有约250新元。

五 | 他感叹道：“我要减少出行和在餐馆用餐的次数。物价在上涨，但我的收入似乎在下降。有时一个月一次，我不得不借个人贷款来维持生活开支。

六 | ”他说，生活成本的上升，尤其是油价的上涨，让情况变得更加糟糕，这对司机而言简直是双重打击。Grab：收入下降 受供需平衡影响 Grab发言人表示，私召车司机收入的下降主要受供需平衡影响，并会因季节和活动的变化而波动。

七 | 在需求高峰期，例如节日或重大活动期间，整个行业的车费和收入通常会上升。发言人指出，今年1月和2月期间，由于新年和农历新年的节日效应，以及第一季度的多场大型演唱会带动了高需求和高车费。

八 | 例如，在今年3月，美国流行女歌手泰勒丝（Taylor Swift）的“时代巡回演唱会”（Eras Tour）吸引了超过36万8000名观众，其中许多是游客。Grab表示，需求通常会在6月公立学校假期和7月至8月国际学校假期期间下降，因为更多人选择在此期间离开新加坡出国旅行。

九 | 这是一年一度的常规现象。发言人也表示，未来几个月，司机可能会看到更多的乘客需求。“随着学校假期结束，我们已经看到需求回升，并预计在下半年在更多大型活动（如F1比赛）举行前，需求将进一步增加。”平台之间的竞争是否导致车费下降？ 私召车司机的收入下降并不是因为司机人数增加。陆路交通管理局的数据显示，从1月到6月，私召车司机的职业执照数量从5万4054个略微下降到5万3536个。司机们更关心的是私召车平台公司之间的竞争。一名67岁的Grab私召车司机表示：“我相信这些科技公司试图相互竞争，但在这样做的过程中，他们把自己的利益置于司机的利益之上。”另一位同时通过TADA和Grab平台提供服务的72岁司机陈先生表示，随着竞争的加剧，车费降低是自然而然的事情。

十 | 他说：“你不能期望收取高额车费，否则谁愿意乘坐？大家都有TADA、Ryde、Grab，他们可以搜索最低价格。”通过TADA平台提供服务的私召车司机表示，他们的收入并未变化。他们表示，尽管平台较小，接到的订单也较少，但由他们采用这个平台是因为于无需支付TADA佣金。然而，一名55岁的兼职司机吴先生认为，零佣金模式可能不会长期存在。他说：“我现在享受这种模式，但我不认为这个模式会一直这样下去，除非TADA找到其他盈利途径。”他还补充说，私召车公司通常会提供奖励以吸引私召车司司机加入，但这些奖励会随着私召车司司机经验的增加而减少。

十一 |

Current article:http://km339m.feishuozhuangkeqi.cyou/ltm6l0/20260826/25671.html

Published on:21:11:10